AI · Healthcare · Medical Imaging
Dental AI
Inference Pipeline
We built a proprietary AI pipeline that analyses intraoral photographs to detect individual teeth, classify dental anomalies, and produce structured per-tooth health assessments for dentist review, deployed end-to-end on cloud infrastructure.
The problem
Dental examination is inherently subjective and time-consuming. A dentist reviewing intraoral photographs must mentally track every visible tooth, assess multiple anomaly types simultaneously, and form a holistic view of oral health, all under time pressure. Early-stage issues like incipient caries or gum inflammation are easily missed when the examination relies entirely on visual inspection of individual images.
Our client needed a system that could analyse photographs programmatically, detecting and tracking individual teeth across multiple frames, classifying the health status of each, and presenting findings in a structured format that supports rather than replaces clinical decision-making.
The AI inference pipeline
We designed and iterated on a multi-stage inference pipeline that turns raw intraoral photographs into reliable, structured clinical outputs. The architecture is organised around a few core phases, each addressing a distinct challenge in moving from unprocessed imagery to a usable per-tooth assessment.
Cloud deployment
We led the end-to-end cloud deployment. The inference service is containerised for reproducible, environment-independent rollout and runs on serverless infrastructure, scaling automatically with demand and avoiding idle compute costs. Encryption and access controls are in place to meet the data security expectations of a healthcare context.
A CI/CD pipeline automates the full build and release cycle, so every code change reaches production through a consistent, tested path with no manual deployment steps.
Path to model independence
The pipeline is designed with a clear path toward progressively replacing external model dependencies with in-house trained alternatives, reducing costs, latency, and third-party exposure as annotation data accumulates and performance thresholds are met.
The phasing prioritises the highest-cost and highest-risk dependencies first, sequenced around the pace at which labelled clinical data can be produced.
Clinical collaboration and data quality
AI performance in medical imaging is only as good as the training data, and training data quality depends on annotation consistency. We worked directly with clinical stakeholders to establish labelling standards for each anomaly category, resolving edge cases, defining boundary conditions, and producing alignment materials including decision flowcharts and classification guides. These materials reduce annotator disagreement and ensure the model trains on labels that reflect genuine clinical consensus rather than individual interpretation.